Publications
July 28, 2013

Court Creates Uncertainty for Construction Projects With Army Corps Permits

Environmental Alert

On April 23, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can retroactively veto an existing Clean Water Act § 404 dredge and fill permit. At issue was a § 404 permit already issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) to a mining company that allowed the placement of the mine's overburden material in a manner that impacted three small streams. Despite expressing concerns about the stream impacts, the EPA did not exercise its power under the Clean Water Act to veto the permit application. The Army Corps issued the § 404 permit in January 2007. Four years later, the EPA retroactively exercised its veto power and revoked the existing permit in January 2011.

Appeals Court Review: In the case, Mingo Logan Coal Co. v EPA, the Court of Appeals ruled that under the Clean Water Act, the EPA can retroactively veto § 404 permits whenever it determines that the discharge of disposal materials will have an "unacceptable adverse impact" on the environment. The Appeals Court held that the Clean Water Act's use of the term "whenever" provided EPA with the authority to withdraw the determination of disposal areas at any time–even after a permit is issued by the Army Corps.

Impacts to Developers: The ruling has serious implications for all construction projects involving dredge and fill activity and requiring a § 404 permit. Any project with a Clean Water Act § 404 permit is at risk if EPA determines, at any time, that the project could have adverse effects on the environment. This gives project developers little guarantee that an Army Corps-issued § 404 permit is, in fact, final. Developers must now pay careful attention to any issues raised or comments made by the EPA during the § 404 permit application process. Further, developers should monitor EPA concerns that may be raised after a § 404 permit is issued, in order to proactively address those concerns. No matter what, the Court of Appeals' ruling makes all § 404 permits–in process and issued–vulnerable to the possibility of an EPA veto.

Firm Highlights

News

David Van Slyke Reappointed by Governor Mills to New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission

Van Slyke is one of five Commissioners from the state of Maine overseeing NEIWPCC PORTLAND—Preti Flaherty’s Managing Partner, David Van Slyke, has been reappointed by Governor Janet T. Mills to the New England Interstate...

Publication

How Much Permitting "Reform" Comes from the New Debt Ceiling Legislation?

Without fanfare or ceremony, on Saturday June 3 rd , President Biden signed the bitterly-negotiated Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (FRA), also known as the Debt Ceiling Limit legislation. While most of the media...

Publication

Post Sackett: What Is the Scope of the Clean Water Act?

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) rendered a decision in Sackett et ux. v. EPA addressing what Justice Alito referred to as a “nagging question” of what water bodies are covered under...

News

David Van Slyke Named to 2024 Lawdragon Green 500: Leaders in Environmental Law

Preti Flaherty’s Managing Partner David Van Slyke has been recognized by Lawdragon as one of the top 500 environmental lawyers in the U.S. It’s the third time he has been named to this prestigious...

News

Preti Flaherty Welcomes Attorneys Michelle Amidzich Fritz and Kat Mail to the Firm

Preti Flaherty is pleased to announce the arrival of attorneys Michelle Amidzich Fritz and Kat Mail. Michelle Amidizich Fritz joins the firm’s Environmental Practice Group in the Boston office. She is a graduate of...