May 25, 2017 Article

Environmental Alert: EPA Reconsidering Obama-Era Water Quality Standards It Set for Maine

Environmental Alert

On May 12, 2017, Maine’s U.S. District Court granted a request by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) for a 90-day stay in a suit by the State of Maine challenging EPA’s efforts to impose stricter water quality standards (“WQS”) in Maine tribal waters.  EPA requested the stay in order to review certain standards put in place by EPA on December 19, 2016 under President Barack Obama’s administration and to determine whether those standards should be reconsidered or withdrawn altogether.

This request by EPA, made in response to a February 27, 2017 administrative petition to EPA by Maine Governor Paul LePage, is consistent with other recent EPA efforts to take a fresh look at eleventh-hour regulatory actions undertaken by the Obama administration.

Maine and EPA have disputed Maine’s jurisdiction over tribal waters since 2004, when Maine sought review of EPA’s decision that Maine had no jurisdiction to regulate discharges of pollutants from tribal wastewater treatment facilities.  In a 2007 decision, the First Circuit concluded that Maine’s position was correct.  EPA then began limiting its approvals of Maine water quality standards to non-tribal waters only.  EPA’s actions triggered a 2014 suit by Maine seeking a declaration that the environmental regulatory jurisdiction of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) applies uniformly throughout the state, including tribal lands. 

In a February 2, 2015 letter, EPA conceded that Maine does have state-wide jurisdiction, but nonetheless disapproved Maine human health water quality criteria for Indian waters because they did not reflect a designated use of tribal “sustenance fishing” for Maine’s Indian waters (a use not previously enunciated or evaluated for Maine waters).  Based on the rationale in its February 2, 2015 letter, EPA published its “Proposal of Certain Federal Water Quality Standards (“WQS”) Applicable to Maine” on April 20, 2016, which was finalized in December 2016.

The February 27, 2017, petition requested that EPA reconsider and withdraw these water quality decisions.  The petition asserts Maine “has statewide environmental regulatory jurisdiction and authority, including all Indian waters and lands” under the 1980 Maine Indian Land Claims Settlement Act and related laws (the “1980 Acts”).

In the petition, Maine maintains that EPA created the new designated sustenance fishing use based on a “convoluted” interpretation of the 1980 Acts that “turns those acts and the intent of Congress on their head” by ignoring Maine’s statewide Clean Water Act jurisdiction and relying on studies that do not reflect current (or even 1980) tribal fish consumption rates.  The Maine petition maintains that any federal water quality standards must be created through rulemaking and not through EPA interpretations of state law that do not follow the procedural requirements of the Clean Water Act.

It is not clear where EPA is going to end up following its review.  The Agency may dig deeper into the legal foundation for the rule and revisit its interpretation of the 1980 Acts, it may re-evaluate the rule’s scientific and technical underpinnings (including the unique exposure assessment utilized to support the “sustenance fishing” use designation), it may consider withdrawing the rule in light of President Trump’s Executive Order calling for federal agencies to eliminate two rules for every new rule promulgated, or it may simply continue to defend its position and the December 2016 rule. 

Not every regulatory action taken by EPA in the final weeks of the Obama administration need be viewed with a jaundiced eye.  In light of the express provisions of the 1980 Acts regarding Maine jurisdiction and the novel approach taken by the Agency in establishing a new designated use in Maine waters, however, the December 2016 Maine WQS rule clearly qualifies for closer examination.

Firm Highlights

Press Coverage

Maine Media Organizations Oppose Foreign Electioneering Ban

Question 2 on Maine’s November ballot asserts that corporations owned or controlled by foreign governments do not have the same rights to political speech as companies here in the U.S. and that foreign governments should be prohibited...

Press Coverage

Bangor Releases Unredacted Files on Effort to Close Homeless Encampment

Following a five-month effort by local media, represented by attorney Sigmund Schutz, chair of Preti Flaherty's Media Law Practice Group, the City of Bangor finally released unredacted records related to its attempts to close a...


FRBP 9006 Doesn't Take Vacations

Bodie Colwell of Preti Flaherty’s Creditors' Rights & Bankruptcy Group, has authored the article "FRBP 9006 Doesn't Take Vacations," appearing in the October 2023 issue of the American Bankruptcy Institute's Young & New Members Committee newsletter...


Preti Flaherty Welcomes Employment Law Attorney Brooke K. Haley to the Firm

Preti Flaherty is pleased to announce that attorney Brooke K. Haley has joined the firm’s Employment Law Practice Group as a Partner. Brooke will work primarily from the firm’s Portland office. Brooke’s practice centers...


Preti Flaherty Ranked Among Best Lawyers 2024 Best Law Firms

Best Lawyers has ranked Preti Flaherty among the Best Law Firms for 2024. To be eligible for ranking, a law firm must have at least one attorney named in the 2024 Best Lawyers in...


November 7, 2023 Election Results

Maine’s November 2023 statewide elections were exclusively referendum questions, four were citizen initiatives, and four were proposed amendments to the Maine Constitution. Of these, Questions 5, 7 and 8 were placed on the ballot...


Remembering Preti Flaherty Founder Robert F. Preti

We at Preti Flaherty are deeply saddened by the passing of one of our founding partners and longtime friend, Robert Preti. Bob was not just a part of our firm; he was a part...


Maine Workers’ Compensation Update - November 2023

The following is an overview of developments with respect to proposed legislation as well as new procedures on independent contractor determinations, medical fee schedule updates, and the use of updated Board forms, including medical...


Eric Osterberg Presents Webinar on IP Rights and Infringement With Podcasts and Livestreaming

Eric Osterberg joins a panel of industry experts to present “IP Rights and Infringement With Podcasts and Livestreaming.” The panel focuses on guiding intellectual property counsel on the IP issues that arise when creating...

Press Coverage

Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting Wins Public Records Dispute with York County Jail