November 6, 2017 Article

Workers' Comp Alert: Appellate Division Revisits Issue of Refusal of Suitable Work

Maine Workers' Comp Alert

In Johnson v Maine Department of Transportation, WCB App. Div. No. 17-32 (October 11 2017), the employee sustained a low back injury on May 12, 2010, causing a herniated disc. He had surgery but was unable to resume his pre-injury job duties. He was accommodated by the DOT and paid benefits on a voluntary basis. After the employee’s primary care physician (PCP) imposed new work restrictions, the DOT was no longer able to accommodate him.

Accommodations and Complications

The State found a clerical position in the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and offered it to the employee. During a meeting with a DHHS supervisor, the physical demands of the position were not discussed but the employee observed DHHS employees bending and lifting paper files. DHHS offered the job but the employee declined because he perceived it would entail more bending and also because he and his family had a prior negative experience with DHHS. The employee’s physician also endorsed the employee’s refusal of the offer from DHHS after the employee had related his impression of the job. After performing a work search, the employee found part-time work as a convenience store clerk and a full-time manager for Pronto Oil Service. These jobs paid less than the job at DHHS, which would have paid more than the employee’s pre-injury wages at DOT.

ALJ Analysis

The administrative law judge (ALJ) found the medical evidence relied upon by the employee’s PCP to be unpersuasive on the issue of whether the DHHS offer constituted a bona fide offer of reasonable employment. The ALJ ultimately determined that the employee rejected a bona fide offer of reasonable employment without good and reasonable cause and that the employee’s period of refusal did not end when his doctor endorsed his decision to refuse the job offer, when the employer withdrew the offer or when he found work elsewhere.

The Appellate Division's Opinion

The Appellate Division affirmed. It noted that simply because DHHS filled the position once offered to the employee does not prove that the State was no longer willing or able to accommodate him. The Appellate Division noted that, had the employee communicated a willingness to work, the State would have an incentive to find a suitable position for him. Thus, his failure to request reemployment with the State was not excused after DHHS filled the position it had offered. The Appellate Division rejected the argument that the period of refusal had ended when the employee found suitable work elsewhere because it would erode an employee’s incentive to meet their earning potential.

Firm Highlights


Maine WC Alert: Appellate Division Upholds Ruling on Reinstatement Provisions and Termination of Benefits

Maine WC Appellate Division Holds That Ongoing Noncompliance with Reinstatement Provisions in Section 218 Precludes Termination of Benefits for Expiration of Durational Cap Under 213 Section 218 of the Maine Workers’ Compensation Act provides...


Maine WC Appellate Division Addresses Refusal of Suitable Work and Notice

The Maine Workers' Compensation Appellate Division recently addressed cases dealing with refusal of suitable work and notice. Both decisions rely heavily on the specific facts of each case. In the context of a refusal...


Maine WC Alert: Appellate Division Rules No Consequences Under 218 for Deferment of Receipt of Old-Age Social Security Benefits

In Pratt v. S.D. Warren (No. 19-3 [WCB App. Div. April 30, 2019]), S.D. Warren appealed a decision denying its Petition for Approval of Discontinuance of Incapacity Benefits. An employer may reduce incapacity benefits...


Maine WC Alert: Appellate Division Addresses the Issue of Timely Notice in Two Recent Decisions

For claims for which the date of injury is on or after January 1, 2013, unless otherwise provided by the Maine Workers' Compensation Act, proceedings may not be maintained unless notice of an injury...


Maine WC Alert: MAE Unit Publishes Guidance on Compliance with Recent Amendments

The Maine Workers’ Compensation Board’s Monitoring, Audit & Enforcement Unit has issued a document to provide guidance on complying with certain recent amendments to the Workers’ Compensation Act in P.L. 2019, c. 344 (LD...


Maine WC Alert: Updated Version of Notice of Controversy (WCB-9) Must Be Used Effective February 1, 2020

Following the recent statutory changes to the Workers’ Compensation Act, the Maine Workers’ Compensation Board has updated the language in Box 22 of the Notice of Controversy. This new version should be used as...


Maine WC Alert: Appellate Division Clarifies Section 327 Death Presumption

Maine Workers' Compensation Appellate Division Clarifies Burdens of Production and Proof Regarding Notice in the Context of the Section 327 Death Presumption In Estate of Deyone v. ITG Brands, LLC (WCB App. Div. 19-7...


Maine WC Alert: New Legislation Brings Procedural Changes, Benefit Modifications

LD 756 (“ An Act To Improve the Maine Workers’ Compensation Act of 1992 ”), was signed into law by Governor Mills on June 17, 2019. LD 756 has an effective date of September...


Maine WC Alert: Latest Appellate Division Rulings on Health Insurance Payments, Social Security Benefits

The Maine Workers' Comp Appellate Division recently issued rulings in the cases of Rich v. Maine Turnpike Authority and Butler v. City of Portland. Health Insurance Payments Made by Self-Insured Employer for Health Insurance...


Maine WC Alert: Appellate Division Reiterates Requirement to Trigger Retirement Presumption

Maine Workers' Comp Appellate Division Reiterates That Working in Customary Job Until Retirement Constitutes “Termination of Active Employment” Sufficient to Trigger the Retirement Presumption In Capitan v. NewPage Paper (WCB 19-10 [App. Div. April...