Publications
February 9, 2021

Answering Employer COVID-19 Vaccination Questions

As COVID-19 vaccines become more readily available, employers are faced with big questions. Can we mandate vaccines for employees? How do we manage a return to work? Preti Flaherty's Peter Callaghan breaks down the answers to some of the most frequently asked questions.

May we mandate the COVID-19 vaccine for our employees?

Yes.  It is permissible but employers should carefully analyze whether they want to mandate vaccination or strongly encourage it.  A mandate may implicate the ADA, Title VII, GINA and others.  If an employee voices a religious objection or is unable to be vaccinated on account of a disability, an accommodation excusing the employee from the vaccine requirement may be in order.  A mandate may also lead to morale problems or present difficult decisions about handling those who do not comply. The EEOC issued a guidance on December 16, 2020 that should be consulted.

May we offer incentives to employees to receive the vaccine?

Yes.  Employers considering incentives, such as time off, cash payments or gifts, should review whether such a program may be viewed as discriminatory.  The ADA restricts incentives as part of wellness programs and screening questions that elicit medical information may trigger the ADA.  Consider how to handle those who have a religious objection to the vaccine or who are unable to be vaccinated due to a disability:  should those employees nevertheless receive the incentive.  Attempting to screen those employees for why they are not vaccinated may lead to impermissible medical inquiries. The EEOC was asked for guidance this month by the business community and may provide the guidance to address these thorny issues.

How do we treat employees who do not receive the vaccine?

Carefully.  The answer depends on the reason why the person is not vaccinated despite being eligible.  If someone refuses, that person could be prevented from coming to work and could be terminated.  But if the person is not vaccinated due to a religious objection or medical condition, the employer should take steps to explore whether and how to accommodate that person, such as restructuring the work area or work schedules or allowing for remote work.  The traditional accommodation rules apply (is it a hardship or is there no viable accommodation) and only after exhausting all options should an unvaccinated employee be terminated. Employers should avoid asking questions that improperly elicit medical information and consider the employer may not want to know the reason someone has not received the vaccine. To protect against these traps, train personnel on what constitutes an impermissible medical inquiry and include warnings to employees that they should not inadvertently disclose protected medical or genetic information.

Is it permissible to require proof of vaccination?

Yes.  But strongly consider why that may be requested (is it to relax certain safety practices for example) and how to handle employees who decline to provide the proof.  While it may be a valid policy, enforcement may be difficult because it could lead to disputes over religious considerations or medical conditions.  If someone declines to provide proof, strict enforcement of all safety guidelines may be the safest response.

Must employers continue to follow safe practice guidelines?

Yes.  Everyone remains at some risk at this time.  Those who have been vaccinated are protected, but they may still transmit the virus.  And the science is uncertain about whether the vaccine is completely effective against variants.  Some employees may not be vaccinated and remain at risk.  At present it is unknown how long those who have been infected and recovered are immune and when they could be re-infected.  The best practice to maintain a safe workplace for all employees and visitors is to continue to follow the federal and state guidelines, including use of face coverings, physical distancing, signage, cleanliness, remote work, travel restrictions and others. OSHA issued an updated guidance on January 29, 2021 recommending that employers continue to employ safety measures for both vaccinated and unvaccinated employees.  The CDC also recommends continued adherence to these safety measures.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Failure to Follow Your Contract's Notice Requirements Can be Costly

In Kinetic Systems, Inc. v. IPS-Integrated Projects Services, LLC et. al., No.: 20-cv-1125 (D.N.H. February 6, 2024), the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted summary judgment for a general contractor...

News

Preti Attorneys File Suit Against Al-Generated Robocalls in the 2024 NH Presidential Primary

Representing the League of Women Voters of New Hampshire, the League of Women Voters of the United States, and individual voters, Preti Flaherty, with co-counsel, filed a federal lawsuit against Steve Kramer, Lingo Telecom...

Event

When to Say Goodbye: Navigating Leave and Terminations

As an HR professional, hiring the right talent, addressing employee needs, and managing terminations are just a few of the most challenging problems that arise. During this year's three-part Employment Breakfast Webinar Series, we'll...

News

Attorney Jeffrey Thaler Named to 2024 Lawdragon Green 500: Leaders in Energy Law

Preti Flaherty’s attorney Jeffrey Thaler has been recognized by  Lawdragon  as one of the top 500 Leaders in Energy Law. This is Jeff’s third time named to this prestigious list since the first publication...

Publication

Important Updates to American Arbitration Association Construction Industry Rules and Mediation Procedures

The American Arbitration Association (AAA) updated its Construction Industry Rules and Mediation procedures (AAA Rules), effective March 1, 2024, marking the first update since 2015. The updates are important because the AAA Rules are...

News

Preti Flaherty Welcomes Trust and Estate Attorney Elise Salek to the Firm

Preti Flaherty is pleased to announce that Elise Salek has joined the firm’s Trusts & Estates Practice Group. Practicing out of the firm’s Concord, New Hampshire office, Elise brings nearly three decades of experience...

Event

Conducting Success: Tuning Up Your Discipline and Performance Framework

As an HR professional, hiring the right talent, addressing employee needs, and managing terminations are just a few of the most challenging problems that arise. During this year's three-part Employment Breakfast Webinar Series, we'll...

Publication

Supreme Court Rules Certain Impact Fees Unconstitutional

A recent Supreme Court ruling in  Sheetz v. County of El Dorado  makes it clear that impact fees adopted by a legislative body may work as an unconstitutional taking of property. The Issue: This...

News

Benchmark Litigation Names Preti Flaherty 2024 “Maine Firm of the Year"

Benchmark Litigation  has named Preti Flaherty as 2024 Litigation Firm of the Year in the State of Maine. Through extensive peer- and- client reviewed research, as well as analysis of casework; the Benchmark Awards...

Publication

Re/Descheduling Marijuana Through Administrative Action

In the article "Re/Descheduling Marijuana Through Administrative Action" published in the Oklahoma Law Review , authors Scott Bloomberg, Alexandra Harriman, and Shane Pennington explore the complex legal framework surrounding the federal scheduling of marijuana...