Publications
February 9, 2021

Answering Employer COVID-19 Vaccination Questions

As COVID-19 vaccines become more readily available, employers are faced with big questions. Can we mandate vaccines for employees? How do we manage a return to work? Preti Flaherty's Peter Callaghan breaks down the answers to some of the most frequently asked questions.

May we mandate the COVID-19 vaccine for our employees?

Yes.  It is permissible but employers should carefully analyze whether they want to mandate vaccination or strongly encourage it.  A mandate may implicate the ADA, Title VII, GINA and others.  If an employee voices a religious objection or is unable to be vaccinated on account of a disability, an accommodation excusing the employee from the vaccine requirement may be in order.  A mandate may also lead to morale problems or present difficult decisions about handling those who do not comply. The EEOC issued a guidance on December 16, 2020 that should be consulted.

May we offer incentives to employees to receive the vaccine?

Yes.  Employers considering incentives, such as time off, cash payments or gifts, should review whether such a program may be viewed as discriminatory.  The ADA restricts incentives as part of wellness programs and screening questions that elicit medical information may trigger the ADA.  Consider how to handle those who have a religious objection to the vaccine or who are unable to be vaccinated due to a disability:  should those employees nevertheless receive the incentive.  Attempting to screen those employees for why they are not vaccinated may lead to impermissible medical inquiries. The EEOC was asked for guidance this month by the business community and may provide the guidance to address these thorny issues.

How do we treat employees who do not receive the vaccine?

Carefully.  The answer depends on the reason why the person is not vaccinated despite being eligible.  If someone refuses, that person could be prevented from coming to work and could be terminated.  But if the person is not vaccinated due to a religious objection or medical condition, the employer should take steps to explore whether and how to accommodate that person, such as restructuring the work area or work schedules or allowing for remote work.  The traditional accommodation rules apply (is it a hardship or is there no viable accommodation) and only after exhausting all options should an unvaccinated employee be terminated. Employers should avoid asking questions that improperly elicit medical information and consider the employer may not want to know the reason someone has not received the vaccine. To protect against these traps, train personnel on what constitutes an impermissible medical inquiry and include warnings to employees that they should not inadvertently disclose protected medical or genetic information.

Is it permissible to require proof of vaccination?

Yes.  But strongly consider why that may be requested (is it to relax certain safety practices for example) and how to handle employees who decline to provide the proof.  While it may be a valid policy, enforcement may be difficult because it could lead to disputes over religious considerations or medical conditions.  If someone declines to provide proof, strict enforcement of all safety guidelines may be the safest response.

Must employers continue to follow safe practice guidelines?

Yes.  Everyone remains at some risk at this time.  Those who have been vaccinated are protected, but they may still transmit the virus.  And the science is uncertain about whether the vaccine is completely effective against variants.  Some employees may not be vaccinated and remain at risk.  At present it is unknown how long those who have been infected and recovered are immune and when they could be re-infected.  The best practice to maintain a safe workplace for all employees and visitors is to continue to follow the federal and state guidelines, including use of face coverings, physical distancing, signage, cleanliness, remote work, travel restrictions and others. OSHA issued an updated guidance on January 29, 2021 recommending that employers continue to employ safety measures for both vaccinated and unvaccinated employees.  The CDC also recommends continued adherence to these safety measures.

Firm Highlights

Press Coverage

Maine State Police Announces Restructuring After 3 Weeks of Declining to Share Details

On June 10, the Maine State Police announced plans to reorganize troop deployment and delegation of manpower in line with revised law enforcement priorities. The announcement follows several weeks of secretive posturing and a lack...

Press Coverage

Court Orders State Police to Reveal More Details About Misconduct by Troopers

Previously concealed records of trooper misconduct by the Maine State Police must be provided in response to public records requests by the press, according to a ruling by Judge William R. Anderson of Penobscot Superior...

Publication

How Does the Collapse of Roe v. Wade Impact Employer Health Plans?

On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned its prior decisions in  Roe v. Wade  and  Planned Parenthood v. Casey , which held that the U.S. Constitution prohibits states from banning abortion or...

Publication

Primary Round-Up

Primary Round-Up As you are probably aware, primary elections in Maine took place on Tuesday, June 14, and there were a handful that could be significant to the general election outcome in November. Congressional...

Event

2022 Maine Employment Law Summit

Join Us for the Return of Preti Flaherty's Annual Employment Law Summit! After two years away due to the pandemic, we've been thinking a lot about how office environments have changed during that time...

News

Racial Justice Fund Seeks Applications for Second Round of Grants

The Maine Justice Foundation is pleased to announce the second round of grants from the Racial Justice Fund. The Foundation will accept applications for grants of up to $10,000 from June 1-15, 2022. The...

Publication

Reminder to Continue to Update Policies and Practices to Reflect Latest COVID-19 Guidance

You might be sick of thinking about COVID-19 but people are still getting sick and employers must take appropriate action to keep the workplace safe. There has been a steady increase this summer in...

News

Attorney Jason Howe Named MEREDA Public Policy Committee Co-Chair

Preti Flaherty attorney and co-chair of the firm's Real Estate and Finance Practice Group Jason Howe has been named co-chair of the Maine Real Estate & Development Association's Public Policy Committee. MEREDA’s active Public Policy...

News

Sixteen Preti Flaherty Attorneys Selected as Chambers USA Leaders in Their Field

Sixteen Preti Flaherty attorneys and six practice groups have been selected for inclusion in the 2022 Chambers USA Guide to America's Leading Lawyers for Business , the highly regarded directory of leading attorneys and...

Press Coverage

Five Major Norwegian Salmon Companies Agree to $85 Million Settlement in Antitrust Case

Preti Flaherty announced today that a Miami federal Court has granted preliminary approval to an $85 million settlement agreement in an antitrust case involving alleged price fixing of farmed salmon sold in the United...