May 11, 2020

COVID-19 and Contractual Non-Performance

Managing Risk on Existing Projects

In contractual relationships extreme events may occur through no fault of the impacted party, temporarily inhibiting or completely preventing performance. During this pandemic, the inability of businesses to provide goods or services due to interrupted supply chains, governmental restrictions or other factors, has interfered with fulfillment of contractual obligations.  Fortunately, there are multiple legal remedies to consider. 

Some remedies are found within the contract itself (force majeure, renewal and termination clauses).  In the absence of contractual remedies, protections also exist through Maine’s Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) and judicial legal precedents (also known as the “common law”).  If a contract is for the sale of goods, the UCC controls; if a contract is for services or some other purpose, the common law applies.

Contractual Remedies

Businesses should review any contracts with outstanding performance obligations for potential mitigation tools in the form of force majeure, termination and renewal clauses.  Force majeure clauses may provide a remedy to failed performance due to a pandemic such as COVID-19. Whether COVID-19 triggers a contract’s clause depends on the negotiated terms.  Renewal and termination provisions should also be reviewed to determine whether termination or non-renewal are cost-effective options. 

What is a Force Majeure Clause? Generally, force majeure is defined as an event that can be neither anticipated nor controlled. Many agreements contain force majeure clauses to mitigate the risk of breach by partial performance or non-performance due to an unforeseeable event that impacts a business.

Is the Coronavirus a Force Majeure Event? Whether a contract captures pandemics as a force majeure event, depends on the terms negotiated by the parties.  In reviewing a contract’s force majeure clause, determine whether the list of qualified events is unrestricted or is a finite list.  Typical open-ended clauses which allow for events outside those expressly enumerated within the contract contain the following phrases:

    • including; including, without limitation; and including, but not limited to; or
    • other [similar] events beyond the [reasonable] control of the Impacted Party.

Terms that may apply to COVID-19 include reference to:

    • “pandemics,” “epidemics,” “diseases” and “quarantines”;
    • “government action” (a government-mandated quarantine or shelter-in-place may meet the definition); or
    • “Act(s) of God.”

How is the Force Majeure Clause Invoked?

    • Notice:  Most contracts require the impacted party immediately notify the other party.  Some contracts contain a deadline to provide written notice.

    • Mitigation:  Once invoked, force majeure clauses entitle the other party to terminate the contract in the event of a force majeure occurrence, and may impose additional obligations on the impacted party to assist in resourcing substitutions, delivering inventory and work in process, etc. 

  • How Will a Court Apply a Force Majeure Clause? Application of a particular event like COVID-19 to a contract breach, is fact-driven.  But in general, courts consider the following factors:
    • whether the force majeure clause specifically references an event as beyond the parties’ control;
    • whether the force majeure event was foreseeable at the time of the contract;
    • whether the force majeure event caused the party’s non-performance;
    • whether the impacted party tried to find an alternate method to perform the contract; and
    • whether notice requirements were followed.

If a contract has no force majeure clause, both the UCC and the common law contain defenses for failure to meet contractual obligations due to an unforeseeable event.

UCC Impracticability

Under the UCC, a party may be excused for non-performance when performance becomes commercially impracticable because of unforeseen circumstances.  Where a supplier’s performance is only partially impacted, the supplier must fairly allocate the available inventory among its customers.

  • Is Notice Required of a Delay? As with force majeure clauses, the supplier must timely notify the buyer that delivery will not occur or may be materially delayed, along with notification of any partial inventory available.

  • What about Installment Contracts? Failure to respond to the seller within a reasonable time not exceeding 30 days causes the contract to lapse with respect to the affected deliveries.  If the delay or quantity deficiency will substantially impair the whole contract’s value, the Buyer must notify the Seller in writing that:
    • the contract is terminated, discharging any unexecuted portion of the contract; or
    • the contract is modified by agreeing to available substitution.

Common Law:  Impossibility, Impracticability, and Frustration of Purpose

For contracts not governed by the UCC, the common law recognizes situations in which one party’s performance is impacted by intervening, unforeseeable events. 

  • Doctrine of Impossibility:  A party's contractual obligations can be excused if performance becomes objectively impossible because of a supervening event. Courts apply the doctrine narrowly and only to contracts where performance is truly no longer possible.  The doctrine does not apply to situations where performance is just financially unappealing or performance difficult, but not impossible.  Performance is not considered impossible if a substitution could fulfill contractual obligations.

  • Frustration of Purpose:  Frustration of purpose is a limited excuse that applies when, due to a supervening event, a party's principle purpose for entering the transaction is destroyed or obviated. With this excuse, performance is not impossible but one party's reason for doing the deal no longer exists. Frustration of purpose can excuse performance only if:
    • the party seeking to be excused can no longer accomplish his purpose for the transaction;
    • both parties knew of the frustrated party's principal purpose for entering the contract; and
    • a qualifying supervening event caused the frustration of purpose.

  • Doctrine of Impracticability:  This doctrine excuses performance by a party due to a supervening event which caused performance to be so difficult and expensive that it becomes impracticable, though technically possible.  Again, like with Impossibility, the bar is set high in considering whether an event caused an unreasonably high cost increase that truly impaired performance.

In addition, courts considering a contract breach due to partial or complete non-performance analyze the foreseeability of the breach. Parties to contracts negotiated prior to the coronavirus outbreak could not have foreseen the possibility of the major commercial disruption caused by this pandemic.  Accordingly, a party’s failure to fully meet their contractual obligations due to the coronavirus may be excused to the extent performance remains commercially impracticable.

Suggested Best Practices in the Wake of COVID-19

  • Identify Potentially Impacted Supply and Service Lines
    • Determine mitigation steps to any potential vulnerabilities
    • Consider alternate suppliers or vendors

  • Review All Contracts
    • Prioritize contracts that have current performance requirements
    • Understand and track notice obligations under key contracts
    • Review Force Majeure, Termination, Cancellation, and Renewal Clauses
    • Analyze the basis for any current non-performance and whether it fits into the force majeure clause

  • Notify Vendors, Suppliers and/or Customers Regarding Potential Impacts
    • Notification of performance issues should be done as soon as possible. 

    • In the case of an applicable force majeure clause, given the extent of this pandemic’s effects change daily, an impacted party may want to proactively issue a “protective” or “continuing” force majeure notice that accounts for the evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on that party’s inability to perform its obligations under the contract.

  • Modify or Terminate Existing Contracts

    • Renegotiate current contracts, including any long-term performance agreements.  Identify ways to modify obligations with alternative product/service or delivery postponement.

    • Consider terminating contracts and seek agreement from other parties.

  • Ensure Adequate Contractual Protection on New Contracts

    • Carefully review contracts prior to engaging in new contractual relationships to ensure provisions adequately consider ongoing COVID-19 impacts and future pandemics.

  • Consult with a Business Attorney for Assistance

Firm Highlights


Preti Flaherty COVID-19 Resources

In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, Preti Flaherty's attorneys have maintained a constant stream of the most up-to-date information and resources for our clients, business partners, and others struggling to navigate these complex...


Owner's Guide to Mitigating COVID-19 Risks in the AIA A201-2017 General Conditions

While the AIA A201-2017 is generally a well-understood contract, COVID-19 presents new logistical and economic risks that can leave owners at risk unless edits are made. This guide focuses on changes to the AIA...


COVID-19 and 401(k) Plans—Ability to Suspend Employer Contributions

As a result of the COVID-19 epidemic, many employers are looking to conserve cash in order to continue operations.  Some may wonder whether they can suspend employer contributions to 401(k) plans. Suspension of contributions...


Funding Programs For Businesses Impacted By COVID-19

We know our business clients are facing unprecedented uncertainty and questions as the world grapples with the implications of COVID-19. The flood of news and information is coming rapidly and can be overwhelming. At...


Contractor's Guide to Mitigating COVID-19 Risks in the AIA A201-2017 General Conditions

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented new risks and challenges that will affect construction projects for years to come. This business level summary provides specific recommended edits that contractors and construction managers should consider when using...


Construction Alert: Gov. Baker Clarifies Massachusetts Construction Requirements and Possible Future Impacts for New Hampshire

The state of construction in Massachusetts continues to evolve as Governor Baker issued another order yesterday tightening  the list of types of construction that are allowed to proceed  as "essential services." Under the new...


Contractor's Guide to Mitigating Risks in the AIA A201-2017 General Conditions

The AIA A201-2017 is generally a well-understood contract document and is used in a significant number of construction projects each year. While this standard contract covers most risks, there are a number of areas...


Preti Flaherty Attorneys Jason Howe and Emily White Help Advance Massive $59 Million Development Complex In Seacoast

The Kittery Planning Board has given final approval to a $59 million mixed-use residential development off Interstate 95, a project that has been in the works for several years. Preti Flaherty attorneys Jason Howe...


Attorney Kara Sweeney Selected by Peers as “Lawyer of the Year” in Best Lawyers in America 2021

Preti Flaherty attorney Kara Sweeney has been recognized in Best Lawyers in America 2021 as the “Lawyer of the Year” for the Concord region in the field of Corporate Law. Inclusion in Best Lawyers...


48 Preti Flaherty Attorneys Selected by Peers for Inclusion in Best Lawyers in America 2021, Including 4 “Lawyers of the Year”

Forty-eight Preti Flaherty attorneys have been named to Best Lawyers in America 2021, including four recognized on the inaugural “Ones to Watch” list for attorneys earlier in their careers and four “Lawyer of the...