Publications
February 11, 2016 Article

Maine Workers' Compensation Board Rules on Compensability of Medical Marijuana; Appellate Division to Ultimately Rule on the Issue Following Recent Oral Argument

In December 2015 the Workers’ Compensation Board Appellate Division heard oral argument in Bourgoin v. Twin Rivers Paper Company, WCB No. 89-01-36-55 (March 16, 2015), a case in which the ALJ found the cost of medical marijuana compensable. Ignoring the classification of marijuana under federal law as an illegal drug, the ALJ found it significant that medical marijuana is, “authorized by state law and tolerated by federal law enforcement.” The ALJ dismissed the argument that Maine law protects “private health insurers” from being required to pay for medical marijuana, by finding that workers’ compensation insurers “are not private health insurers, so this statute does not apply.”

In Noll v. Lepage Bakeries, Inc., WCB No. 12-003547B (September 18, 2015), the ALJ denied an employee’s petition seeking payment for medical marijuana, finding that the Maine Medical Use of Marijuana Act provision that the statute may not be construed to require a “. . . private health insurer to reimburse a person for costs associated with the medical use of marijuana…” applies to shield a worker’s compensation insurer from responsibility to pay for medical marijuana. The ALJ reasoned that because a workers’ compensation insurer is required to pay work injury related medical bills it qualifies as a “private health insurer” under the Maine Medical Use of Marijuana Act.

Following the issuance of that decision, the Employee then moved for further findings of fact and conclusions of law. The ALJ issued further findings reversing the above decision. In these further findings dated November 2, 2015, the ALJ found persuasive the employee’s argument that (1) the Act defines self-insured employers (in Noll, the employer was self-insured) as an “employer” rather than any kind of “private health insurer” and, even if the employer and TPA were considered an insurer, the Act and Bureau of Insurance Regulations define WC insurance as “casualty” rather than “health” and, therefore the Employer is not a “private health insurer” within the Title 22 exemption. This is significant because, under the ALJ’s reasoning, all workers’ compensation insurers (self-insured and traditional insurers) fall under the umbrella of casualty insurers and, therefore, are not considered “private health insurers.” Therefore, no workers’ compensation insurer would be shielded from paying for medical marijuana in the workers’ compensation context.


Firm Highlights

Publication

Maine WC Alert: MAE Unit Publishes Guidance on Compliance with Recent Amendments

The Maine Workers’ Compensation Board’s Monitoring, Audit & Enforcement Unit has issued a document to provide guidance on complying with certain recent amendments to the Workers’ Compensation Act in P.L. 2019, c. 344 (LD...

Publication

Maine WC Alert: Appellate Division Reiterates Requirement to Trigger Retirement Presumption

Maine Workers' Comp Appellate Division Reiterates That Working in Customary Job Until Retirement Constitutes “Termination of Active Employment” Sufficient to Trigger the Retirement Presumption In Capitan v. NewPage Paper (WCB 19-10 [App. Div. April...

Publication

Maine WC Alert: Updated Version of Notice of Controversy (WCB-9) Must Be Used Effective February 1, 2020

Following the recent statutory changes to the Workers’ Compensation Act, the Maine Workers’ Compensation Board has updated the language in Box 22 of the Notice of Controversy. This new version should be used as...

Publication

Maine WC Alert: Latest Appellate Division Rulings on Health Insurance Payments, Social Security Benefits

The Maine Workers' Comp Appellate Division recently issued rulings in the cases of Rich v. Maine Turnpike Authority and Butler v. City of Portland. Health Insurance Payments Made by Self-Insured Employer for Health Insurance...

Publication

Maine WC Alert: Appellate Division Rules No Consequences Under 218 for Deferment of Receipt of Old-Age Social Security Benefits

In Pratt v. S.D. Warren (No. 19-3 [WCB App. Div. April 30, 2019]), S.D. Warren appealed a decision denying its Petition for Approval of Discontinuance of Incapacity Benefits. An employer may reduce incapacity benefits...

Publication

Maine WC Alert: Appellate Division Addresses the Issue of Timely Notice in Two Recent Decisions

For claims for which the date of injury is on or after January 1, 2013, unless otherwise provided by the Maine Workers' Compensation Act, proceedings may not be maintained unless notice of an injury...

Publication

Maine WC Alert: Appellate Division Upholds Ruling on Reinstatement Provisions and Termination of Benefits

Maine WC Appellate Division Holds That Ongoing Noncompliance with Reinstatement Provisions in Section 218 Precludes Termination of Benefits for Expiration of Durational Cap Under 213 Section 218 of the Maine Workers’ Compensation Act provides...

Publication

Maine WC Appellate Division Addresses Refusal of Suitable Work and Notice

The Maine Workers' Compensation Appellate Division recently addressed cases dealing with refusal of suitable work and notice. Both decisions rely heavily on the specific facts of each case. In the context of a refusal...

Publication

Maine WC Alert: Appellate Division Clarifies Section 327 Death Presumption

Maine Workers' Compensation Appellate Division Clarifies Burdens of Production and Proof Regarding Notice in the Context of the Section 327 Death Presumption In Estate of Deyone v. ITG Brands, LLC (WCB App. Div. 19-7...

Publication

Maine WC Alert: New Legislation Brings Procedural Changes, Benefit Modifications

LD 756 (“ An Act To Improve the Maine Workers’ Compensation Act of 1992 ”), was signed into law by Governor Mills on June 17, 2019. LD 756 has an effective date of September...