Corporate officers should beware that liability for unlawful employment
practices under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) can reach beyond the
protective umbrella of a business and into their personal funds. For Maine
employers, the First Circuit’s recent decision in Chao v. Hotel Oasis,
Inc., 493 F.3d 26 (1st Cir. 2007), is an unsettling
reminder of this point.
How does Chao v. Hotel Oasis relate to your business?
According to the U.S. Small Business Administration and Maine Office of
Economic Development, the vast majority of businesses operating in Maine — both
large and small — are locally owned and/or controlled, which leaves corporate
officers’ personal assets vulnerable during many liability disputes.
For example, In Hotel Oasis, a group of 282 hotel workers —
from cooks to maintenance workers — successfully asserted numerous minimum wage
and overtime violation claims under the FLSA against their corporate employer as
well as its president in his individual capacity. Siding with the hotel
workers, the First Circuit held the hotel and its president jointly and
severally liable for over $280,000 in back wages and liquidated damages covering
a period of roughly four and a half years of willful FLSA violations.
When does “operational control” lead to personal liability?
The First Circuit’s rationale for holding the hotel’s president personally
liable was, in essence, his undisputedly “instrumental role [in] running the
hotel[,] managing its employees [and] causing the corporation to violate the
FLSA.”
The First Circuit emphasized that “a corporate officer with operational
control of a corporation’s covered enterprise is an employer” within the
meaning of the FLSA and, therefore, can be held personally liable for willful
violations of the statute.
In determining whether a corporate officer has sufficient “operational
control” to warrant personal liability for a willful violation, the First
Circuit instructed that the following basic factors must be carefully
evaluated:
- ownership interest in the corporation
- degree of control over the corporation’s financial affairs and compensation
practices
- role in causing the corporation’s statutory violation
How can you avoid personal liability under FLSA?
While the First Circuit’s decision in Hotel Oasis recognizes that
personal liability is not necessarily justified for “just any employee with some
supervisory control over other employees,” the ruling signifies the increasing
prevalence of such liability for the key decision-makers behind unlawful
employment practices of various kinds.
In light of this development,
corporate officers — particularly those executives charged with guiding the
corporation’s employment law practices — should remain mindful of the personal
liability that can arise for violations of employment laws such as the FLSA.
As the Department of Labor ominously advised in the shadow of the First
Circuit’s decision in Hotel
Oasis: “Employers must take seriously their responsibility to pay
their employees properly for all hours they work, and they must understand that
we will make every effort to ensure that they do so.”