Client Login | Subscription Center | Offices | Contact Us | Site Map | Site Search | Alerts  
PretiFlaherty Logo
  
About Us Professional Directory Practices Industries Case Studies Resources News & Events Career Center
Accidental Overpayments
Resources : Publications
August 4, 2002

The New Hampshire Perspective

Unlike Maine, New Hampshire’s legislature has not directly addressed accidental overcompensation of an employee by an employer.  However, the Legislature and the New Hampshire Department of Labor have indirectly addressed this scenario by restricting an employer’s ability to withhold any portion of an employee’s wages.

The circumstances under which a New Hampshire employer may make a deduction from an employee’s wages are identified in RSA 275:48.  Specifically, an employer is not permitted to withhold or divert any portion of an employee’s wages unless (1) a federal or state law requires or permits the deduction; (2) an employee authorizes the employer in writing to make a deduction for a lawful purpose accruing to the benefit of the employee; or (3) the employer makes a deduction pursuant to any rules or regulations for medical, surgical, or hospital care or service, without financial benefit to the employer. 

The New Hampshire Department of Labor has further elaborated on, and possibly limited, an employer’s ability to withhold an employee’s wages.  In its rules, the Department of Labor has specified the deductions which an employee may authorize in writing as the following: installment payments of legitimate loans by the employer to the employee; union dues; health, welfare pension and apprenticeship fund contributions; voluntary charity contributions; housing and utilities; savings funds held by someone other than the employer; voluntary rental fees for non-required clothing; voluntary cleaning of uniforms and non-required clothing; and an employee’s use of a demonstrator vehicle pursuant to statute.  Notably, this list is written as exhaustive and does not include reimbursements to employers for overcompensation.
Significantly, even the New Hampshire Supreme Court has recently recognized that RSA 275:48 precludes employers from engaging in "self-help" to recover money they believe they are owed by an employee.  See Fowler v. Town of Seabrook, 765 A.2d 146, 145 N.H. 536 (2000).  Despite the Court’s recognition of RSA 275:48 as limiting an employer’s ability to withhold an employee’s wages, the Court failed to provide employers with any guidance for recovery.
Accordingly, New Hampshire employers must proceed with caution when attempting to recover overcompensation from employees.  An employer should recognize that its ability to withold an employee’s wages is subject to statutes and regulations.  At a minimum, a New Hampshire employer should obtain written authorization from the employee before making any deduction not otherwise authorized by law from the employee’s paycheck.  However, the lack of clarity on this issue indicates that employers should seek guidance from the Department of Labor prior to making such a deduction, even with written authorization.

Publications Publications
Newsletters Newsletters
Practices
- Labor and Employment
Keyword Search
Disclaimer
©2008 Preti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios LLP
Preti Flaherty Image