Earlier this year, a new federal workplace injury and illness recordkeeping
regime took effect. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) has promised that the new requirements will be easier for employers to
understand, offer more accurate workplace statistics and will go farther in
protecting employee privacy. OSHA has begun a broad outreach effort geared
to employers, including a new page on its agency website devoted to the changes:
www.osha-slc.gov/recordkeeping/index/html.
Federal law now requires covered
employers to comply with revised regulation 29 C.F.R. Section 1904 and to use
OSHA’s new Form 300 (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses), Form 300A
(Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses), and Form 301 (Injury and
Illness Incident Report). Many covered employers, however, are just now
encountering the nuances imposed by OSHA’s new recordkeeping rules.
For example, many employers are reporting uncertainty on the
ramifications of the new rules on workers’ compensation reports. OSHA is
assuring covered employers that recording an injury or illness neither affects a
person’s entitlement to workers’ compensation nor necessarily proves a violation
of some OSHA safety rule. The provisions of Maine’s Workers Compensation
Act of 1992 have no direct impact on whether a case needs to be recorded on an
OSHA Form 300 Log. It is conceivable that some injuries are compensable
but not OSHA recordable, while others may be OSHA recordable but not compensable
under the Maine Act.
Additionally, the fact that an employee makes a report of injury does not
establish the existence of the injury for recordkeeping purposes. In
determining whether an injury is recordable, an employer must first decide
whether an injury, as defined by the OSHA regulation, has occurred.
Employers who are uncertain about whether an injury has occurred may refer the
employee to a physician or other medical professional for evaluation and may
consider that person’s opinion in determining whether an injury
exists. If the person diagnoses a significant injury or illness
within the meaning of 29 C.F.R. Section 1904.7(b)(7) and the employer determines
that it is work-related, then the injury must be recorded.
Under the old rule, all workplace illnesses had to be recorded,
regardless of severity. Now, recordability requirements are more
subtle. The new regime requires that injuries and illnesses be recorded
according to the same criteria, meaning that some minor illnesses no longer need
be recorded. Employers are obligated to record work-related injuries or
illnesses only if they result in one of the following: death; days away from
work; restricted work or transfer to another position; medical treatment beyond
first aid; loss of consciousness, or diagnosis of a significant injury/illness
by a physician or some other licensed medical professional. Despite this
liberality, the new rules impose a stricter standard with respect to needlestick
and sharps injuries. Unlike the old standard, employers must now record
all such incidents to the extent that the injury involves potential
contamination by other person’s blood or a potentially infectious
material. Specific criteria are also provided in the new regulation for
deciding when a mental illness is to be considered work-related.
Lastly, the new regulations expand employee privacy protections.
Employers are required to protect employee identities by withholding an
individual’s name from a Form 300 for certain types of sensitive injuries and
illnesses (e.g., HIV infections, mental illnesses, sexual assaults). A
complete list of all injuries and illnesses considered “privacy concern” cases
is provided at 29 C.F.R. Section 1904.29(b)(7). Moreover, employers are
now required to remove employee names before providing injury and illness data
to third parties who do not have access rights under the regulation.
However, all covered employers must keep a separate, confidential list of the
case numbers and employee names for all privacy concern cases, in the event that
OSHA requests disclosure.