Client Login | Subscription Center | Offices | Contact Us | Site Map | Site Search | Alerts  
PretiFlaherty Logo
  
About Us Professional Directory Practices Industries Case Studies Resources News & Events Career Center
State Employees May Not Pursue ADA Claims Against Employers in Federal Court
Resources : Publications
April 10, 2001

In February of this year, the U.S. Supreme Court, resolving a split among the Courts of Appeal, held that state employees may not sue their employers for money damages in federal court in actions alleging violations of the ADA.  The Court concluded that such suits are barred by the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, which provides that States may not be sued by private individuals in federal court. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett.

The Court acknowledged that Congress is not without power to abrogate the States' immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. When enacting legislation that does so, however, Congress must demonstrate its intent to allow private suits against a State in federal court, and must act pursuant to a valid grant of constitutional authority. 
The ADA does provide that "a State shall not be immune under the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States from an action in [a] federal or state court of competent jurisdiction for violation of this Act," thereby reflecting the intent that the immunity be abrogated.  However, the Supreme Court held that States maintain their immunity from ADA claims for money damages in federal court, because Congress lacked constitutional authority to abrogate that immunity.

Although the Court acknowledged that the ADA reflects the desirable public policy that there should be a "comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities," it found that this policy does not reflect a pattern of unconstitutional discrimination by the states. It also viewed the ADA's accommodation duty as one that exceeds that which would be constitutionally required under the Fourteenth Amendment.  Thus, state employees may not pursue claims for money damages against their employers in federal court under the ADA.

Both the Eleventh Amendment and the Court's decision apply only to states. They do not render units of local government, such as cities and counties, immune from suit in federal court.

Publications Publications
Newsletters Newsletters
Attorneys
- Olivier, Elizabeth A.
Practices
- Labor and Employment
Keyword Search
Disclaimer
©2008 Preti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios LLP
Preti Flaherty Image