For decades, the Maine Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics has
been establishing minimum wages for state funded construction projects without
controversy. However, a change in the methodology utilized by the Bureau
combined with the introduction of wages paid to natural gas pipeline workers
resulted in elevated rates throughout the state for the year 2000. The
Associated Constructors of Maine filed an administrative appeal, which was
joined in by the Maine Turnpike Authority. The appeal was opposed by the
AFL-CIO and the Maine Building Trades Council.
The minimum wages, or "prevailing wages," as they are commonly referred
to, are established in accordance with a series of Maine statutes similar to
those requiring minimum wages on federally funded projects. Although
legally applicable only to state funded projects, the minimum wages mandated by
the statute are believed by many to have a carry over impact on privately funded
projects. Previously, the Bureau of Labor Statistics had calculated wages
for four separate regions, based on rates paid during the second and third weeks
of September of the previous year. For the year 2000, the Bureau began
utilizing a single state-wide set of rates, despite statutory language requiring
that wages be those "in the locality in like construction."
As a result of
the appeal, Department of Labor Commissioner Valerie Landry ruled in July that
the Bureau acted improperly when it calculated rates on a state-wide basis,
since the impact of the gas pipeline workers' wages would be felt state-wide,
instead of only in those regions in which the construction took place.
Commissioner Landry ordered that the rates be recalculated on a regional
basis. In addition, she ordered that the Bureau initiate rulemaking, which
will entail public input and scrutiny, to establish standardized procedures for
applying the prevailing wage law.
The Department of Labor's decision to overrule its own Bureau of Labor
Statistics has now been appealed to the Maine Superior Court by the
AFL-CIO. The burden of overturning an administrative agency's order is a
difficult one. In any event, the order requiring rulemaking will remain in
effect, giving interested entities and members of the general public the
opportunity to provide input into this important precedent setting process.
The Maine Turnpike Authority was represented by Preti, Flaherty,
Beliveau, Pachios & Haley, LLC.