On September 15, 2007, the Maine Human Rights Commission
finally defined "gender identity" and "gender expression." These changes
contemplate that in addition to homosexual, heterosexual, and bisexual
employees, employers also have transgender, transsexual, or employees in
transition in the workplace and will need to address related issues in a
professional, lawful, and sensitive manner in accordance with the 2005 Act to
Extend Civil Rights Protection to All People Regardless of Sexual Orientation
("Act").
The Maine Legislature passed the Act in 2005 to protect people from
discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in employment, housing, places
of public accommodation, credit extension, and educational opportunity. Sexual
orientation is defined as a person's "actual or perceived heterosexuality,
bisexuality, homosexuality, gender identity, or gender expression." Though the
Act specifically protects "gender expression" and "gender identity," the Act did
not include definitions for either term until just recently.
How Does the Maine Human Rights Commission Define "Gender Identity" and
"Gender Expression?"
Though the definitions of each term are not in and of themselves
controversial, these definitions have sparked concern in the employer community
because it is unclear how broadly or narrowly "gender identity" and "gender
expression" should be interpreted under the Act. The definitions of each are
available on the Maine Human Rights Commission website.
Who is Protected by the New Rules?
Commission staff suggest that the new Rules protect from discrimination only
those employees whose full time gender identity and biological sex
diverge. The Rules are not intended to protect, for example, cross dressing in
the workplace, or discrimination against an employee whose manner of dress is
deemed not "feminine" or "masculine" enough for their biological sex. Some
suggest that these examples do not evidence a full time disconnect
between biological sex and gender identity.
How Should Employers Implement the New Rules?
The Act and these new definitions address the fact that employers currently
have transgender or transsexual employees, or employees contemplating transition
and will have to deal with issues such as name changes, pronoun usage, dress
codes, taking time off for transition, and bathroom use.
Ultimately, the new Rules may be problematic for employers because they
suggest that employers should inquire into an employee's gender identity to
determine if gender identity differs from biological sex, and if that employee
adheres to one gender identity all the time or only some of the time.
Though the Maine Human Rights Commission suggests that each case should
involve "an interactive process between the employee and the employer to
identify reasonable accommodations that are appropriate under the
circumstances," this assurance may not be specific enough to be practical for
employers.